Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth Nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence. LEIGH A. PAYNE: Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2008.


PDF

Keywords

PAYNE
Reconciliation
state
civility
Feitlowitz

How to Cite

Feitlowitz, M. (2010). Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth Nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence. LEIGH A. PAYNE: Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2008. EIAL - Estudios Interdisciplinarios De América Latina Y El Caribe, 21(1), 132–134. https://doi.org/10.61490/eial.v21i1.106

Abstract

Fora scholar who studies torture in the context of state-sanctioned violence,Leigh Payne sustains great faith in democracy. In fact, the resiliency andresourcefulness of transitional democracies to confront, process, and utilizehorrific "confessions" is a major theme in her valuable book. Payne positionsher argument squarely between two competing schools of thought: that the full,graphic accounts of evil-doers (in controlled settings, such as South Africa'sTruth and Reconciliation Commission [TRC]) ultimately lead to healing andreconciliation; and the belief that "too much truth" undermines, even endangers, the return to civility. Payne argues for what she terms "contentiouscoexistence."
https://doi.org/10.61490/eial.v21i1.106
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.